Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 4,639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm
” The three most popular religions in the United States, Christianity, Judaism, and Islam — which combined account for 97.7% of all believers — are monotheistic. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
With distressing frequency, especially in capital cases such as this, federal judges refuse to be governed by Congress’s command that state criminal judgments must not be revised by federal courts unless they are “contrary to, or involv[e] an unreasonable application of, clearly estab- lished Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,” 28 U. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:26 am
Volungus, 595 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2010); United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:35 pm
United States Jaycees; the Court distinguished Matthews v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:13 am
” Ruthann Robson of Constitutional Law Prof Blog notes that “[w]ithout much fanfare, President Obama signed into law the Animal Crush Video Prohibition Act of 2010, intended to cure the defects of the previous [animal cruelty] law, held unconstitutional last April in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:03 am
Jones & Laughlin Steel, United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 1:31 am
v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:35 pm
In particular, Justice Scalia contends (at pages 40-41 of Common Law Courts in a Civil Law System: The Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting the Constitution and Laws, in A MATTER OF INTERPRETATION: FEDERAL COURTS AND THE LAW (1997)) that the whole point of a Constitution is to prevent backsliding on rights (and other matters). [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:52 pm
United States, Justice Scalia also cited some pretty old authorities. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:48 am
Justices like John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito are far more conservative than the mainstream in the United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers tells the “long-shot” story of United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:26 am
United States, 09–1555, and Beer v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:22 am
Alito, Jr., and Clarence Thomas, Scalia wrote: “With distressing frequency, especially in capital cases such as this, federal judges refuse to be governed by Congress’s command that state criminal judgments must not be revised by federal courts unless they are ‘contrary to, or involve an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:07 pm
Assistant to the Solicitor General Joseph Palmore appeared next, on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of Chase. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:26 pm
”“I was an illegal immigrant in the United States,” Hayek said. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:13 am
” Assistant to the Solicitor General Curtis Gannon argued on behalf of the United States as an amicus supporting First Derivative. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 7:45 pm
Acting Deputy Solicitor General, Leondra Kruger on behalf of the United States, faced similar questioning from Alito: [W]hat is the employer supposed to do . . . . [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:56 am
In Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:34 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument last week in Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:32 am
Cardegna, 546 U.S. 440, 443 (2006) (emphasis added) (Scalia, J.); Hall Street Assoc., LLC v. [read post]
