Search for: "Sides v. Beene"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 25,490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
Ellis v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 12:20 pm
DF, R (On the Application Of) v Essex County Council (2023) EWHC 3330 (Admin) DF had been living with her mother, a tenant of Colchester City Council. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 8:48 am
Case citation: Domen v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
The court noted the decision of the Court of Appeal in The Procter and Gamble Company v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:46 am
Last week, the Virginia Court of Appeals addressed whether hearsay can be allowed in a probation hearing in the post-Crawford world.In Henderson v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
From Luo v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 9:02 am
HOWEVER, an even more interesting story is that of Exxon v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 11:59 pm
Challenges have been brought in both jurisdictions - in Ireland, it was Colgan v IRTC [2000] 2 IR 490. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:08 am
A good chunk of the debate in McCullen v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:11 am
Some indefatigable projectors have contrived them with a door on each side, and others, still more acute and profound, make them with a door on one side. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:38 pm
Tereshko issued an Order without an Opinion in the case of Carter v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
In a ruling that sent shockwaves through the internet community, the Ninth Circuit, with one judge dissenting, found that an injunction should have been granted against YouTube, requiring removal of the “Innocence of Muslims” film. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:09 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:28 am
It has been almost one year since the Supreme Court decided PLIVA v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm
Briefs have been filed and a hearing is set for March 7. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:00 am
And Thursday's Mississippi Supreme Court decision in City of Jackson v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:08 pm
Company v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 9:55 pm
Finally, IPKat contributors Jeremy and Birgit have co-authored a note on the European Court of Justice ruling in Case C-398/08 Audi AG v OHIM (the Vorsprung durch Technik Community trade mark application, noted here by the IPKat) and which has just been published in Sweet & Maxwell's Journal of Business Law (JBL). [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:03 pm
In Díaz-Alarcón v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:01 pm
Wash. 2009); citing Baker v. [read post]
