Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 9,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2018, 2:24 am
See, e.g., Demleitner, Nora V., et al. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:33 am
District Court Judge William B. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:21 am
Brown v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:14 am
This is a district court ruling, so it’s not the final word on whether online services can be treated like company towns. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:38 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
The court of appeals answered the first question "yes," and the second, "no. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 5:33 pm
” Id.; see also Missouri v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:29 pm
Allowing DCOP to withhold its CEQA arguments from its administrative appeal and assert them in court for the first time under these circumstances would appear antithetical to the purposes of the jurisdictional exhaustion requirement, which include lightening the burden of overworked courts while developing a complete administrative record promoting judicial efficiency and facilitating judicial review. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:24 pm
Supreme Court unanimously held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:01 pm
But as United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 11:07 am
As the Supreme Court recognized as early as Myers v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 8:20 am
" United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 1:46 pm
” First, the court noted that judicial restraint in interpreting the reach of criminal statutes reflects deference to Congress and a concern for fair notice about the content of the law. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:05 pm
So it was for the court’s ruling today in Ayestas v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:06 pm
” The District Court imposed a three-year prison sentence, which was suspended for two years. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:43 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in a 1966 case called United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:35 pm
Supreme Court: Gill v. [read post]
