Search for: "State v. M. C. M." Results 3521 - 3540 of 6,592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2010, 5:11 am by Susan Brenner
At 2:36 a .m. was from 410-770-3929. [read post]
10 May 2014, 12:23 am by Florian Mueller
I'm also a programmer (by the way, the U.S. patent application I filed this week includes roughly 100 pages, much more than the average patent application, of sample code I wrote in C#, which is very much like Java), so I, too, liked to hear that. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
State oversight and greater transparency and accountability since creation of the Fair Defense Act and the Indigent Defense Commission.2/3: Two major lawsuits: Rothgery v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 1:30 pm by Orin Kerr
Earle, 405 F.3d 278, 286 (5th Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 9:05 am by Guest Author
A case that the Supreme Court will hear in the October, 2022 Term, United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 2:28 pm by Morris Turek
  Unfortunately, it appears that Carefusion has not recently reviewed the Anti-Dilution Act set forth in 15 U.S.C. 1125(c), which states that a “famous” mark is one that is “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s owner. [read post]