Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 4,684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
In the Second Circuit, which includes New York, the factors for the test for confusion is that as laid down in the Polaroid Corp v Polarad Elecs. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:59 am
(TTABlog) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – Apple gets go-ahead to move against unauthorized accessory makers: Apple v eForCity et al (ArsTechnica) [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:01 pm
See Shager v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 7:38 am
Wyeth, the Court held that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 completely preempts state law design defect claims against makers of vaccines covered by the Act. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:19 am
Merck Eprova AG v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:59 am
The FTC has lamented post-merger price hikes for life sustaining drugs (see FTC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:22 am
In Wyeth v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:50 am
" The Court remanded the case so that definition of the class could be changed to: "All persons who purchased Yo-Plus in the State of Florida. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:01 pm
AndreIn Staub v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:52 am
Image by Getty Images via @daylifeIn Tesla Motors, Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:51 am
Based on yesterday's Monday's oral argument in McComish v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Consider Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Texas decisions, at least twenty-one state advocacy organizations formed.Some achieved legislative victories, convincing state lawmakers to repeal sodomy prohibitions.Meanwhile, advocates urged state courts to use state constitutional law to provide protections for lesbians and gay men.Of the eleven states that decriminalized sodomy after Bowers, eight did so through the courts.Not only did state court activism result in on-the-ground victories,… [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 11:18 am
Drug maker Wyeth has filed a petition for certiorari in Wyeth v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:43 pm
See Kasten v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:48 am
And while the attached judgment in the Florida case [State of Florida v Federated Institute for Patent and Trademark Registry (FIPTR), see also petition for certiorari here] does not count as true research, it is my contention that it gives a snapshot of the kind of impact that such invitations can have and are having. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
Hanff states:"TrustE carried out an experiment to measure the effectiveness of the (US Do-Not_track) icon. [read post]
