Search for: "State v. So "
Results 3521 - 3540
of 117,849
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 6:11 am
He held (at paragraph 26) that this approach was wrong, thus overruling the decision in GW v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:39 am
Given Pruneyard -- which, I get, was rendered in an era in which California courts were perhaps more strongly free speech oriented than today -- I think that the state court might well have been more solicitous of the state law constitutional claim than federal judges.Plaintiff can still take its shot in the United States Supreme Court, but I don't think that'll go anywhere. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 2:22 pm
Abstract below: The Supreme Court’s recent holding in Oklahoma v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
In Langenkamp v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 6:01 pm
For background, see Jonathan Pink interviews: District Court Invalidates Portion of Copyright Act as Unconstitutional; Holds State University and Employee Immune From Claim for Copyright Infringement (April 15, 2008) and Follow up questions on state university copyright immunity case - Marketing Information Masters v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 11:38 am
Id. at 295; see also United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:59 pm
In so far as the damages may have value as money they are not worth pursuing. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
He referenced the case of R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg discussed earlier today to support his submission on behalf of the government that when Parliament wants to exercise control over the prerogative power then it has done so expressly. 16.21: In response to a query from Lord Mance about the relevance of the legislation after the ECA 1972, James Eadie QC submits that as Article 50 was not in existence until… [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:39 am
Koch v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:27 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
This is so for two important reasons. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:29 am
If so, they could share custody. [read post]
Gutierrez v Juarez, 2017 WL 3215659 (D. Arizona, 2017)[Mexico] [Habitual Residence][Petition Granted
15 Sep 2017, 9:10 am
Baxter v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 7:42 am
. $5,000 just so happens to be the exact minimum statutory threshold for losses to state a claim under the CFAA. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 7:22 pm
In Cockhren v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 10:32 am
Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 11:20 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:08 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:16 pm
A recent case out of Washington State decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit -- Ocampo v. [read post]
