Search for: "State v. Still" Results 3521 - 3540 of 44,269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2019, 8:14 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Cyberheat CA Appeals Court: Claims Under State Spam Statute Not Preempted by CAN-SPAM – Hypertouch v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
(…) In the meantime, Heller filed for bankruptcy under chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:56 am
On October 10, 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office publishedExamination Guidelines for Determining Obviousness Under 35 U.S.C. 103 in View of the Supreme Court Decision in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am by Eric Goldman
Google * Competitive Keyword Advertising Still Isn’t Trademark Infringement, Unless…. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 10:16 am by Lyle Denniston
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the main opinion  in the much-anticipated case of Evenwel v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:59 am
  Jurisdictional battles in IP were confined to memories of Actavis v Lilly and pan-European DNIs, not, what is essentially, the scope of a damages inquiry. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:00 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
The state assembly and senate versions aren’t identical, and Governor Gavin Newsom said he was still in negotiations with Uber, Lyft, and other companies. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:37 pm by John W. Arden
’s motion to dismiss trademark infringement and dilution claims brought by the Navajo Nation (The Navajo Nation v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On July 7, 2017, the California Supreme Court filed its 69-page opinion, written by Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and joined by five other justices, in Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On July 7, 2017, the California Supreme Court filed its 69-page opinion, written by Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and joined by five other justices, in Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 3:00 am by Dale B. Halling
While the Supreme Court has done away with the "useful, concrete and tangible result" test from State Street Bank v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:35 am
The Supreme Court has recently delivered an important judgment in the case of National Legal Services Authority v Union of India (NALSA). [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm by Jeff Gittins
  If the ruling stands, it will surely result in an end to the still-pending case regarding the State Engineer's denial of the change application. [read post]