Search for: "State v. Word" Results 3521 - 3540 of 40,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am by MOTP
This argument is even stronger in this case because the Contract itself provides for severability of any provisions found invalid and because the arbitration clause is worded broadly. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 7:18 am by Daniel Hemel
United States: whether the word “money,” when used in the context of compensation, extends to remuneration in stock-option form. [read post]
The district court’s judgment was vacated and the case remanded for trial (Tiffany and Company v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:07 am by Eugene Volokh
We argue that Maria Vullo, a New York state regulator, threatened to use her regulatory power over banks and insurance companies to coerce them into denying basic financial services to the NRA and, in Vullo's own words, "other gun promotion" groups. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:57 am by Eric Goldman
Johnson County CC * Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
United States, 581 F.2d 390, 397 (4th Cir. 1978). [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
eBay defended their position by stating that this was how the search system worked: it automatically purchased the misspelled words as commercial links, redirecting consumers to their website to purchase genuine Louis Vuitton goods.Although the final award was substantially lower than the initial amount claimed by LVMH (a mere €1.2 million), the court was firm in placing the responsibility of the infringement squarely on the shoulders of eBay. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 5:32 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: 2018_09-indian-news In this issue you will find:   • Word from the Chair • HB-2951: Increasing Services to Report and Investigate Missing Native American Women • Exercising Sovereignty Through Tribal Courts • Eluding the Proper Scope of Federal Jurisdiction: United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
 Well, the words that the Sorrell used in describing the proper test -- right before it expressly applied the existing four-part Central Hudson test to invalidate the statute in that case -- were arguably a bit different that the words used in Central Hudson. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:42 pm
Readers of this blog may recall my criticism of the Ninth Circuit's decision in Pintos v. [read post]