Search for: "Thomas v. State" Results 3521 - 3540 of 15,504
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2020, 12:23 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the denial of review in Rogers v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:42 am by Donna Bader
Justices Alito, Thomas and Kavanaugh dissented. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:23 am by Christopher Tyner
Defense counsel’s performance was deficient in the punishment phase of a capital murder trial because counsel failed to conduct an adequate investigation into the mitigation case as well as into the State’s aggravation case Andrus v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:15 am by Adam Feldman
Thomas and Sotomayor only once voted together without any other justices, in dissent from the 2016 decision in Voisine v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:00 am
Reversing the Fourth Circuit, the Supreme Court on Monday issued its opinion in United States Forest Service v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:02 am by Howard Bashman
Justice Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court in United States Forest Service v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
 None of the accusations are true, he states. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:35 pm by Masha Simonova
Justice Clarence Thomas stated as much in his concurrence, arguing that “the time has come to consider discarding the Bivens doctrine altogether. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The complaint (full text) in Illinois Baptist State Association v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:39 am by Roger Parloff
In other words, it was drafted and enacted precisely to deal with the situation that has arisen in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am by Josh Blackman
Justice Thomas's Concurring Opinion Justice Thomas also concludes that the PROMESA "Territorial officials" are not "officers of the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 10:56 am by OxFirst
It discusses, among other matters, the Second Circuit’s recent decision in Castillo v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 7:56 am by Brad Schnure
” We are compelled to remind you of the New Jersey Supreme Court’s ruling in Lance v. [read post]