Search for: "Towne v. Towne"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 8,451
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
"The failure to negotiate in good faith is an improper employment practice" (Matter of Town of Islip v New York State Pub. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 6:46 pm
Bill Clinton notoriously parsed the meaning of “is” and in Jacobellis v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
In the case of Almeida Leitão Bento Fernandes v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 9:28 am
In Reynolds v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 5:21 am
Oral arguments in the case of City of Carmel v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 9:16 am
In Chiaraluce v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 12:14 am
On the basis of these findings, the Naberezhnye Chelny town prosecutor asked the Town Court to issue a declaration that seven issues of the magazine constituted extremist materials. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:22 am
In Sliski v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:46 am
In Diodati v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 9:21 am
In this case, “V” stands for “Violence” and also “Vivisection. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 6:33 am
The case is Gerard v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 9:37 am
V. involving an infringement claim of Eli Lily’s pemetrexed patents. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:16 am
Prager Univ. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
"Applying the Pell Doctrine set out in Matter of Pell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale and Mamaroneck, 34 NY2d 222, held that in adjudicating disciplinary matters the penalty imposed by the appointing authority "must be upheld unless it is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, thus constituting an abuse of discretion as a matter of law. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale and Mamaroneck, 34 NY2d 222, held that in adjudicating disciplinary matters the penalty imposed by the appointing authority "must be upheld unless it is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, thus constituting an abuse of discretion as a matter of law. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 1:12 pm
"Applying the Pell Doctrine set out in Matter of Pell v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale and Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, opined that it "was not so disproportionate to the offense as to shock the conscience. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
Wade and Dred Scott v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222.The court then confirmed the Board's decision and dismissed DeStefano's appeal "on the merits. [read post]
