Search for: "United States v. Alter"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 4,638
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2011, 8:10 am
The last time we covered the progress of the case that I’ll call Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:00 am
The Law Offices of James V. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 8:18 am
Instead, the lawsuit builds on a 2003 United States Supreme Court decision, Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm
In this respect, the Court recalls its case-law to the effect that a Contracting State is considered to retain Convention liability in respect of treaty commitments and other agreements between States subsequent to the entry into force of the Convention (see, for example, Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498/08, §§ 126-128, ECHR 2010-…). [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 11:37 pm
See United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 5:50 pm
This morning the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights handed down its long-awaited judgment in Al Skeini & Others v United Kingdom, and its partner case of Al Jedda v United Kingdom, concerning whether the United Kingdom had any liability under the Convention for the alleged deaths and detention of individuals in SE Iraq during its military campaign there. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:38 pm
The drug or other substance has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:40 pm
In Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
The Cases of the Day, NML Capital, Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:43 am
This morning the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights handed down its long-awaited judgment in Al Skeini & Others v United Kingdom, and its partner case of Al Jedda v United Kingdom, concerning whether the United Kingdom had any liability under the Convention for the alleged deaths and detention of individuals in SE Iraq during its military campaign there. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
” State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 6:47 pm
But in an homage to the United State Supreme Court, the Court was divided 3-3-1, and so even after reading all the opinions in the case it is not clear what it means for the future.The primary opinion, issue by Chief Judge Lippman, states, "The threshold, and we believe dispositive, issue on these appeals is whether a resentencing sought by a defendant to correct an illegally lenient sentence is effective" to move the date of that prior conviction. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
You can now add to the court’s good precedent United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 4:25 am
In Perry v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 4:22 am
In Perry v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:50 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:36 pm
Such discrimination was illustrated on the state level in the case of Bellmore v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:08 pm
Hamilton in his Report of the Bank and Marshall in McColloch v. [read post]
