Search for: "W. D."
Results 3521 - 3540
of 13,758
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2017, 11:43 am
Speakers: Ronald D. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
Articles on the topics of: Regional aid R&D&I Environmental protection Sectoral aid Ex-post evaluation W encourage authors to write on all major areas of State aid law, economics and policy. [read post]
28 May 2009, 6:00 am
§1332(d)(4)): [W]e hold that a nationwide retailer with operations spread across many states will be a citizen of California only when a substantial predominance of its activities are located in California; it will not be a citizen of California merely because its operations in California cater to California's larger population. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:04 pm
How he avoids getting cancelled at Berkeley I'd like to know. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm
Brie D. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 1:36 pm
See, e.g., BETWEEN INVENTION AND INNOVATION: AN ANALYSIS OF FUNDING FOR EARLY STAGE TECHNOLOGY DVELOPMENT (2002) (w/ Philip Auerswald); Taking Technological Risks: How Innovators, Executives, and Investors Manage High-Tech Risks (MIT 1991) (w/ Philip Auerswald), http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/1760/taking_technical_risks.html [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 4:46 pm
Smith w/Bress; partial dissent by N. [read post]
1 May 2016, 11:54 am
Then bring them into conversation w/1A theories. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
The FDA took its time because the petition “raise[d] complex issues requiring extensive review and analysis by Agency officials. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:16 am
W. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 6:06 am
I’d have liked to see some depth to the discussion of what problems have arisen because, as a culture, we gave up on the ideal of color blindness, which was so clear and dominant in the 1960s. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:02 am
If they’d fail on the merits, why have 230? [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
D. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
R., 2022 QCCA 1170Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), MontréalDécision de : Juges Martin Vauclair, Patrick Healy et Stephen W. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:26 pm
If you have any questions about this alert, please contact Marc D. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 7:21 pm
Such it seems with the application at hand in In re Stephen w. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 12:56 pm
Experience w/TM law is not promising. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm
If that’s right, it’s not obvious why we’d prioritize patent logic over TM logic. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
A: will be talking to PTO historian; they ended up offering to refund fees to 2010 applicants if they’d abandon them, so may never find out what happened there. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:52 am
"In December 1988, non-party David W. [read post]
