Search for: "X, Y " Results 3521 - 3540 of 4,308
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2010, 1:13 pm by Karen
~ Karen Update March 15:  The discussion continues on the Law Librarian Blog: Carpe Diem Gen X and Y Law Librarians Filed under: Advocacy Tagged: Advocacy, Marketing [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:17 am
" For example: "everyone knows that x is our only real choice," until one learns that other folks have expressed a preference for "y.' It's really an extension of group-think or peer-pressure; we don't want to be "different" because we believe that everyone else thinks a certain way. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 10:10 am by William Carleton
Have you noticed a slate of stories in the news lately about blogging fatigue? [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 7:45 am by Joe Calandrino
This separation allows labels to remain consistent even when Subsection X becomes Section Y based on the internal agency labels. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 10:18 am by Gary L. Francione
If X chooses to reduce suffering by being a vegan, great; if Y chooses to reduce suffering by eating cage-free eggs, great. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 5:15 pm by Mike
For Generation X, Y, and Z, having a child no longer marks entry into adulthood: From time to time, Sasha Raven Gross can be seen teetering around a neighborhood drinking hole. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 8:49 pm by Mark Bennett
As illustrated by the ‘problems’ firms are experiencing with X and Y geners, there has been a global values evolution. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 11:01 am by John Culhane
The plot was OK, if derivative of Pocahontas, until the final chapter which culminated in a tiresome Marine general, encased in a giant robot suit, facing off against the gone-native protagonist, in a battle that for some reason reminded me of Cameron Hodge’s last-stand from an old X-Men comics plot. ? [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:33 am by Howard Wasserman
The Court properly insisted there is no difference for purposes of jurisdictional characterization, which seems right; there does not seem much difference between saying a plaintiff must do X to bring suit and that a plaintiff must prove Y to prevail--either determines the individual's right to bring the case into court and to avail himself of the remedial scheme for a violation of those rights. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:38 pm by Josh Wright
  I can vouch for having given dozens of workshops at law schools where no discussion of panel data techniques and description of what exactly fixed effects control for is sufficient to respond to the “but did you control for X, Y and Z” question. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:20 am by Rita Handrich
Related posts:Generation Y (aka the Millennials): Just the facts [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 2:53 pm by Gene Takagi
Here are some of my favorite posts of the week: GTak: 50 Fascinating Lectures for Humanitarians - http://is.gd/914W9 BoardSource: Senate Passes Jobs Bill That Includes Tax Credit for Nonprofit Employers http://tinyurl.com/ydwpfj4 rosettathurman: Why Don’t More Members of Gens X and Y Join Boards? [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 4:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
If you don’t want to buy my practice, my partners and I can take it down the road to hospital Y. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:08 pm by Carolyn Elefant
  However, for lawyers, I think that the closest analogy between speculative legal services and logo contests is this: A potential client conducts a contest, offering $750 to a lawyer to draft a lease agreement addressing (x, y, z) and that complies with California law. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:33 am by Matt C. Bailey
A statute that provides that a person must do X in order to achieve Y does not mandate that a person must do X, period.If Congress wanted to articulate a general principle that tips are the property of the employee absent a "valid" tip pool, it could have done so without reference to the tip credit. [read post]