Search for: "BELL v. BELL" Results 3541 - 3560 of 5,135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2010, 1:57 am
A secondary meaning, in the Ninth Circuit, is 'the mental association by a substantial segment of consumers and potential customers between the alleged [trade dress] and a single source of their product" (Levi Straus & Co v Blue Bell (1985)). [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
In today’s case (Bell v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:57 pm by Jamie Markham
Because Dilworth was a pretrial detainee, the appellate court applied the analytical framework set out by the Supreme Court in Bell v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:31 am by Bexis
Bell Sports, Inc., 2010 WL 4783043 (E.D. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:14 pm by Gideon
In 2002, in the landmark decision Atkins v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Swims Against The Tide Of Software Patent Ineligibility In Caltech v Hughes http://t.co/7kdz5dlVFU -> Appeals to watch in 2015: the appeals monitor’s top ten http://t.co/ufW4iFwYE2 -> Are you ready for CASL 2.0? [read post]