Search for: "California Physicians" Results 3541 - 3560 of 5,151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2022, 9:36 am by Daniel Jin
The program provides a rebate on the purchase/lease of an eligible vehicle ranging from $2,250 (for a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle) up to $9,500 (for a fuel cell electric vehicle); and (6) adopting California emissions standards for medium and heavy-duty trucks within the state by requiring manufacturers to provide 30% of zero emiss [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 9:32 am by admin
ZPICs and PSCs continue to represent a greater danger to small physician practices and health care provider groups. [read post]
ProPublica's article examines the case of a California man whose care fell into the hands of an independent medical reviewer. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:22 am by Thomas Kaufman
The Seventh Circuit began by looking to the language of the governing regulations (consistent with what the California Supreme Court said should be the proper analysis in Harris v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 9:00 am by Staff
See our Prior post: WHAT MEDICAL PRACTICES SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE STARK LAW The Stark Law is named after California U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm
Some physicians have started to use CAM as a part of support to their conventional medicine practice. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 6:18 am by Ed Wallis
About 15 more Pradaxa lawsuits have been pending in California, Connecticut, and other state courts. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm
In response to legal ambiguities concerning telemedicine laws, California's Board of Psychology has these rules in place: Information on Telepsychology From time to time the board becomes aware of articles or information that would be educational and informative to licensed psychologists and the consumers of psychological services. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:45 am by Bexis
(“a drug manufacturer may rely on the physician to warn the patient”). [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:09 pm by Stewart R. Albertson
In most cases, these uncomfortable questions are either (1) not relevant, (2) lack foundation, (3) are inadmissible hearsay, or (4) can be kept out as “unduly” prejudicial under California Evidence Code section 352. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 12:07 pm
Michael’s clientele  through the Global Vision Law Group includes businesses not only in California, New York, Maryland, Massachusetts, Washington, D.C., and other U.S. states, but also abroad. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:10 pm
Michael’s clientele  through the Global Vision Law Group includes businesses not only in California, New York, Maryland, Massachusetts, Washington, D.C., and other U.S. states, but also abroad. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
The Global Vision Law Group clientele not only includes businesses in California, New York, Maryland, Massachusetts, Washington, D.C., and other U.S. states, but also abroad. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am by John Ehrett
California Teachers Association 14-915Issue: (1) Whether Abood v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 10:53 am
Michael’s clientele  through the Global Vision Law Group includes businesses not only in California, New York, Maryland, Massachusetts, Washington, D.C., and other U.S. states, but also abroad. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 9:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Instead, there is a generalized "medical exemption … available to an employee who provides a written statement from a licensed physician, nurse practitioner or physician assistant that, in the physician's, nurse practitioner's or physician assistant's professional judgment, immunization against one or more diseases may be medically inadvisable. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 12:07 pm
Michael’s clientele  through the Global Vision Law Group includes businesses not only in California, New York, Maryland, Massachusetts, Washington, D.C., and other U.S. states, but also abroad. [read post]