Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 12,891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Employees who work for a company that has been sold may experience some anxiety over what that means for their future as an employee with the company. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Employees who work for a company that has been sold may experience some anxiety over what that means for their future as an employee with the company. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 2:57 am
B. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:11 am
” These inquiries are going to take time, and require companies to take affirmative action—a burden that doesn’t exist under the current law. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:33 am
C. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
“), Nasdaq Listint Rule 5620(b), non-exchange traded public companies can avoid the requirement (although they must still distribute an Information Statement under Section 14(c) of the Exchange Act). [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 6:50 am
Carl C. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:26 am
The majority shareholder argued that the shareholders’ agreement did not apply to Corporations B and C, but Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Charles E. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:15 pm
C/b — called back. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:52 am
Companies are shifting to trade dress claims. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 11:54 am
For example, if Company A has a patent covering a device, and Company B has a patent covering an improvement to the device, Company B may not manufacture the device – even with the additional feature – without permission from Company A. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 5:26 am
(b) Gather more information. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 4:25 pm
Analogizing to the fact pattern you described, even assuming that: a) your employee had a cognizable mental health disability; b) that substantially impaired a major life activity; and c) requested an accommodation; your company still would not be obligated to tolerate the behavioral manifestations of his disability in the workplace. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:09 am
C. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:03 am
§ 1337 (a)(3)(C) requires proof of 'articles protected by the patent' (i.e., a technical prong). [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:58 am
These Regulation A amendments implement Section 401 of the JOBS Act, which added Section 3(b)(2) to the Securities Act of 1933 directing the SEC to adopt rules exempting from the registration requirements offerings of up to $50 million. [read post]
9 May 2020, 9:38 am
As has been noted earlier, the definitional provision in the Arbitration Act, 1940 [Section 2(b)], merely defines an “award” to “mean an arbitral award”. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:46 am
The Asia Global Court concluded that, the attorney-client privilege would be inapplicable if "(a) ... the corporation maintain[s] a policy banning personal or other objectionable use, (b) ... the company monitor[s] the use of the employee's computer or email, (c) ... third parties have a right of access to the computer or emails, and (d) ... the corporation notif[ies] the employee, or was the employee aware, of the use and monitoring policies? [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:29 am
[C.] [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:13 am
As a reminder, the following italicized questions come from Jane C. [read post]
