Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 48,919
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2012, 1:28 pm
See Yankee Atomic Power Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:00 pm
In GPNE Corp. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 10:22 am
By K&L Gates Padgett v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
We are discussing ATP Tour v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 8:01 pm
Spicer v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 8:54 am
See Marks v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:01 am
R (Perinpanathan) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court and another [2010] EWCA Civ 40; [2010] WLR (D) 26 “A magistrates’ court exercising its discretion under s 64(1) of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 ‘to make an order for costs … as it thinks just and reasonable’ in relation to forfeiture proceedings successfully defended was entitled to refuse to order the police to pay the costs on the ground that they had acted… [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 2:36 am
Twombly and Ashcroft v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:19 am
In 1977, the Supreme Court said in TWA v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:57 am
Hot off the heels of Hensel Phelps Construction Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:19 am
” I thought of that definition when I read the recent decision in in CV Ice Company v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 4:13 am
The Haiti earthquake aftermath by Daniel MorelAnd finally, following on from our recent blog on the award of $5.6 million in legal fees and costs against Perfect 10, photographer Daniel Morel has failed in an attempt to be awarded legal costs, despite being awarded $1.2 million by a jury in 2013 after his photos from the Haiti earthquake were widely distributed by news agencies Agence France-Presse (AFP) and Getty after he put them on Twitter:… [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:59 am
In Bolger v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:17 pm
See Hercules Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:27 am
In Cosmetic Procedures Clinic of North Dallas v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:52 am
Friday the Supreme Court granted certiorari in King v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:27 am
In Cosmetic Procedures Clinic of North Dallas v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:06 am
His reasoning was that "it does not seem to me either sound in principle or desirable that the assured should be penalised if it might be said that those costs were also incurred to obtain some further or additional benefit. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 12:47 pm
Green v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:45 pm
Costs may be spoken to if necessary. [read post]
