Search for: "Doe v. ATTORNEY"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 36,736
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2007, 4:26 am
June 10, 1997) ("[W]e conclude that Rule 7 does not authorize a bond to cover estimated costs of attorneys' fees. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:57 am
If you collect from your attorney in legal malpractice, does that affect your right to the money in dispute with "X" and "Y" ? [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:12 am
By Eric Goldman Stayart v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 3:51 am
” ” Although plaintiff does not specifically allege that defendants “failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession” (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442), she does allege that defendants were “negligent and [departed] from acceptable practice for attorneys engaged in the practice oflaw in the State of New York. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 4:04 pm
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 3:07 pm
Attachment and garnishment -- Cook v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 10:30 am
(Perdue v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 7:23 am
Al-Kidd v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Yesterday, in Laffitte v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 10:11 pm
(Moody v. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 3:33 pm
Nicholson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Kilgore v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 5:24 am
The fact that the attorney then misplaced the emails either through accidental deletion or due to spam settings on his email account does not demonstrate the exercise of diligence on the part of the attorney, particularly in light of the fact that the attorney apparently misplaced at least two separate emails and admittedly neglected to read a third. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
Law students often curse the dreaded LARW word count, but the truth is that courts can impose very similar restrictions on practicing attorneys. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERALBRIAN FIREBAUGH, ET AL., PETITIONERS24–657 v.MERRICK B. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 9:15 am
Mass Engineered Design, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:56 pm
We conclude that it does not. . . . [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 4:34 am
Budinich v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:49 am
March 17, 2011) that its holding in Ruiz does not similarly require insurers to disclose attorney-client privileged communications. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:07 am
What does all this mean? [read post]
