Search for: "Doe v. Delaware"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 3,878
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2012, 2:16 pm
Although NOERS may have chosen rationally, from its perspective, the lesser of two evils, the marginal market premium NOERS obtained does not necessarily reflect acquiescence in the approximately $8 Merger price or negate or resolve the concerns of inevitability that animate the controlling shareholder cases…. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 8:31 am
In the context of the duty of care, the Delaware Supreme Court has defined materiality as any event that is relevant and of such magnitude that directors must take into account in performing their fiduciary duties.[24] A perfect example of a material risk can be found in Brane v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:45 am
bit.ly/sd4J63 (Sharon Nelson) Does New Missouri Law Muzzle Teachers on Facebook? [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm
In New Jersey, the Judge does not have to rule that you were drunk. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:10 am
The trusts were formed under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act, 12 Del. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm
Error to deny evidentiary hearing on IAC claim for failure to investigate and present mitigating evidence of brain damage; district court properly denied alleged Brady and Batson violations U.S. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
Can't Escape Hotfile's Claim of Abusing Anti-Piracy Tool http://t.co/E7PLsMuYNK via @feedly -> Link to Disney v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:01 pm
Furthermore, the Tax Court found that that the Limited Partner Exception does not apply to a partner who is limited in name only. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 4:35 pm
Trump v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:14 am
Supreme Court rejected this kind of "end run" in the IPO Laddering Antitrust Case (Credit Suisse v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 3:18 am
And the referee said yes, it does. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:15 am
If we assume the truth of his allegation, does the outcome seem harsh? [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:18 am
So how does it measure up? [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 5:44 am
The Supreme Court said as much when two important cases are read together: the 1905 decision in Jacobson v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 11:42 am
Caremark was recently cited with approval in Marchand v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
The term “power of judicial review” was not used in Marbury v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
If the U.S. military budget does not buy collective defense, then the General Accounting Office needs to get on the stick. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:30 am
But the GDPR does introduce two new dynamics. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(Intellectual Property Directions) USPTO to hold Innovation Week 22-27 June (Patent Docs) US-Korea adopt patent prosecution highway (Law360) (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Obama’s environmentally-friendly present for supporters of the patent system (IAM) How to cut legal costs and improve results in troubled times (IP Frontline) PatentCluster – free clustering based patent search engine (Patent Baristas) Requesting withdrawal of the finality of an office action… [read post]
