Search for: "Does v. United States of America"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 4,684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
Some people decry the "softening" of the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:43 am
Joseph Abbey v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:01 pm
” Balkin says the two positions are ultimately symbiotic, since “dissensus about constitutional values—–the most characteristic feature of constituional Protestantism—is the great engine of constitutional change, shaping even that most ‘catholic’ of institutions, the United States Supreme Court” (97). [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:19 am
EFFECTIVE DATE.AN ACTTo provide the Consumer Product Safety Commission with greater authority and discretion in enforcing the consumer product safety laws, and for other purposes.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,SECTION 1. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm
to be enforced within the United States. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
How Much Power Does a Labor Arbitrator Have? [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm
The EarthGrain Co. k/n/a Sara Lee Bakery Group, Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Reservation of right to appeal claim construction prompting stipulated judgment does not create substantial controversy as to declaratory judgment counterclaims: The Fox Group, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:40 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
SAYS, United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:13 pm
: Dien Ghin Electronic (S) Pte Ltd v Khek Tai Ting (PatLit) South Africa Protecting image rights (IP finance) South Sudan South Sudan: no IP change yet (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat) finds Select exclusive licensee of patent but patent invalid and not infringed: Select v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 2:24 pm
(Following the Supreme Courts decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that prayer (a) which seeks overruling or setting aside of the judgment already passed in Mr X v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow: "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:07 am
Taking the per se position on vertical territorial restraints was United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:28 am
Wood v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am
Becton, Dickinson and Company (Patently-O) Patent malpractice litigation: State versus federal jurisdiction: Magnetek, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm
Hyundai Motor America, Inc. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm
Hyundai Motor America, Inc. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:11 am
United States by Carol M. [read post]
