Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 3541 - 3560 of 7,367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2015, 7:05 am by Dan Ernst
Doug Coulson, Carnegie Mellon University, Department of English, has posted British Imperialism, the Indian Independence Movement, and the Racial Eligibility Provisions of the Naturalization Act: United States v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Social studies and English teachers are watching Wolf Hall on PBS. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:35 am by Juan C. Antúnez
By the way, this presumption was reflected (if not explicitly stated) by the 1st DCA in Cody v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 7:04 am by Graham Smith
If other State law requires information to be furnished in a conspicuous manner, UETA §8 states that you can furnish the information electronically, but must do so in a conspicuous manner. [read post]
21 May 2015, 2:55 am by Lyle Denniston
Plessy’s place in the list of worst Supreme Court decisions Looking back at the Brown v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:30 am by INFORRM
  They carefully considered the historical context of the decision in Wilkinson v Downton. [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:31 pm by Giles Peaker
Home being defined as an ordinary english word. [read post]
19 May 2015, 7:20 am by Bradley Joondeph
On Monday, a sharply divided Supreme Court held in Comptroller v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:45 pm by Steve Vladeck
But whereas Justice Stephen Breyer’s opinion for the Court in Coleman v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:26 am by Giesela Ruehl
Many state courts still apply the Chevron Oil test regarding their own state laws. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
By 2012, when the current litigation began, it was the largest pay TV operator there, offering around 200 channels in Mandarin and Cantonese, plus a small number of English language programmes — all being delivered by a set-top box. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
Blocking injunctions So called “blocking injunctions” under English law have mainly been a feature of copyright law where well-resourced content owners have clubbed together to force internet service providers to the block internet access for pirate websites (See Twentieth Century Fox v BT [2011] EWHC 1981 (Ch) and [2011] EWHC 2714 (“Newzbin 2”) and Dramatico Entertainment & Others v BSkyB & Others [2012] EWHC 268 (Ch)  and [2012] EWHC… [read post]
15 May 2015, 5:39 am
 Recent PatLit pieces review Unwired Planet v Huawei (FRAND and competition law issues held unsuitable for summary judgment) and the award of this year's Prix de thèse Véron & Associés. [read post]