Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 30,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2011, 12:45 pm
After a three-week jury trial, Southern New England Telephone Company has won a verdict finding that employees who were titled as field managers and classified as exempt, were in fact exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act and state law. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 1:58 pm
Recently, the New Hampshire Supreme Court case (State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 10:52 pm
Ramirez v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 5:43 am
The Supreme Court recently clarified the meaning of “changing clothes” under Section 203(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act in Sandifer v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 11:58 am
Second, the majority bent the four “seller” factors a fair amount. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:17 am
Janus v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 5:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:04 pm
If you have questions about whether your agency is covered by State wage and hour laws and therefore subject to the holding in Alvarado v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 11:09 am
State Constitution Protection for Free Speech Censorship enthusiasts love citing the California Supreme Court Pruneyard v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 3:31 am
Thus, in the case, Batson v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 8:36 am
In an administrative disciplinary hearing, conflicting testimony merely "raised issues of credibility" for the hearing officer to resolveMatter of Weymer v New York State Div. of State Police, 2010 NY Slip Op 05779, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentHarry J. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:40 am
"
State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm
The case of Richard Burgon MP v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 3:42 pm
(Gade v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 1:00 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States last month denied certiorari in a 3rd Circuit FLSA case entitled Philadelphia v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 9:36 pm
The case is Holtzman v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 9:36 pm
The case is Holtzman v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 7:52 am
There has been some discussion, for example, about whether or not there needs to be an equal number of check boxes on each side (favoring fair use v. disfavoring fair use) in order for the checklist to itself be fair. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 11:05 am
After Wal-Mart v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 12:12 pm
The 2nd DCA affirmed the dismissal of the case, citing precedent set by the Florida Supreme Court in Mizrahi v. [read post]
