Search for: "Gaines v. State"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 9,733
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
United States, the court held that expert testimony is admissible when the technique or theory it is based on has gained "general acceptance" in the relevant scientific community. [read post]
15 May 2011, 5:12 am
” Tags: baseball, eminent domain, India, Los Angeles Related posts Yogi Berra v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 11:28 am
He then used the prescriptions and planned to submit fraudulent claims to gain reimbursement for home health services that were never needed. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 1:25 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division decision, please use this link: Matter of Newman v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 4:39 pm
In Klumb v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:43 am
Supreme Court appeared to be warning the entire legal system against precisely this course of conduct in City of Ontario v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 2:34 am
District Court for the Southern District of California's latest opinion in Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 1:33 am
He was convicted, and on his release his parole conditions stated he was not allowed to speak to the media and needed to gain permission before he could attend public meetings on Palm Island. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:53 am
One trader’s gain will necessarily be another trader’s loss. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:57 pm
With United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:36 am
However, between its decisions in Ashe and Yeager, the court ruled in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 11:03 pm
Cir. 1995); see also State Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 5:01 am
O'Connell v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 5:02 pm
By Merrill BentAnderson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:08 am
” The petitioners in Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 12:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 7:52 am
Wyndham v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 1:11 pm
In a lengthy opinion in Jackson v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:43 am
The case is PP v. [read post]
