Search for: "Habeas Corpus Cases"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 4,148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2008, 10:02 am
Kennedy's concurrence in one of the latter cases, United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 12:13 am
The argument that “classified information” will have to be disclosed in any habeas corpus hearing is a fallacy. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:31 pm
” (The four dissenters thought it “entirely clear” that habeas corpus did not extend beyond “the sovereign territory of the Crown” under English common law.) [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:25 pm
The argument that “classified information” will have to be disclosed in any habeas corpus hearing is a fallacy. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 1:50 pm
Savage reports that "Guantanamo detainees have constitutional rights, Supreme Court says; In their third rebuke of Bush administration policy, the justices rule 5 to 4 that the prisoners can petition a federal judge for their freedom -- the right of habeas corpus. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:44 pm
"The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 9:53 am
"We hold that petitioners may invoke the fundamental procedural protections of habeas corpus. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:56 pm
Geren, No. 06-1666 "In cases concerning the availability of habeas corpus relief arising from an international coalition force's detention of American citizens who voluntarily traveled to Iraq and were alleged to have committed crimes there, the Court rules that the habeas statute extends to American citizens held overseas by American forces operating subject to an American chain of command, even when those forces are acting as part of a multinational… [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:26 pm
Both statutes sought to strip federal courts of habeas jurisdiction over cases brought by Guantánamo detainees. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:59 pm
The Supreme Court’s lead opinion in the Guantanamo Bay cases Thursday declares simply: “The detainees in these cases are entitled to a prompt habeas corpus hearing….The costs of delay can no longer be borne by those who are held in custody. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:41 pm
Put differently, why does the writ of habeas corpus scare the conservative Justices so much? [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 6:24 pm
My own contribution thereto--on habeas corpus and error correction--is up here. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 6:12 pm
And today, that is exactly what Kennedy did as he wrote for the court that "practical considerations" compelled extension of the constitutional privilege of habeas corpus to noncitizens detainees held at Guantanamo. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 4:36 pm
And yet in his opinion, Kennedy keeps the court on a pretty narrow path, defining the right of habeas corpus (much weighty historical analysis on this front) and explaining why, because of its constitutional significance, Congress can't wish away habeas with a lot of indirection. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 4:29 pm
In my previous writings on the Boumediene constitutional habeas corpus cases, I argued that the DC district court and the DC Circuit court misread the important Eisentrager precedent. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 4:08 pm
We hold these petitioners do have the habeas corpus privilege. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:35 pm
As the Constitution says, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:34 pm
The Court held 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy, that the petitioners at GTMO have a constitutional right to petition for habeas corpus and that the DTA/MCA process of D.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:07 pm
Supreme Court issues ruling in cases challenging whether Military Commissions Act of 2006 violates the habeas corpus rights of foreign detainees held at Guantanamo Bay: According to this post at "SCOTUSblog," "[t]he ruling below, which found for the government, is reversed. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:59 pm
Kennedy wrote for 5 members of the Court: "We hold these petitioners do have the habeas corpus privilege. [read post]
