Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 3541 - 3560 of 6,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2010, 10:27 am by Charles Abut
In support of his motion to terminate alimony, the ex-husband presented what he considered to be "overwhelming evidedence" of the ex-wife's cohabitation with another man. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:21 am by Charles Abut
The ex-husband may be entitled to a trial on the issue of whether alimony payments to the ex-wife should be reduced or terminated, given (a) her acquiring her mother's home for $1 and (b) her residence in that same home, along with both her son and her sister. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 12:17 pm by Gregory Forman
On August 29, 1988, the Court of Appeals affirmed an award of one year rehabilitative alimony over wifes objection in Bryan v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 7:17 am
However, when a wife's fraud is detected they usually claim the latter, and the husband being unaware of the affair is usually unaware of the marital problems; so he unknowingly accepts the explanation (the lesser of two evils). [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 1:46 pm by Georgialee Lang
This week’s decision from the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Ghavim v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Court of Appeals Paternity - Defense of Equitable Estoppel - Applied to Deny Non-Biological Father Right to Deny Paternity In Commissioner of Social Services on Behalf of Elizabeth S. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 9:35 am by MBettman
(affirmed the trial court’s denial of husbands claims that the marital home, purchased by the husband before the marriage, was separate property. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 11:13 am by Joel R. Brandes
It also directed the husband to pay the wife interim counsel fees of $42,000. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 2:00 am by Neil Cahn
There, the parties’ 2021 Stipulation of Settlement provided in relevant part: The parties agree and acknowledge that they shall contribute to the costs and expenses associated with each child’s college or post high school vocational education, with the Husband paying sixty five percent (65%) of such cost and the Wife paying thirty-five (35%) of such cost. . . . [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 3:31 am
Hudspeth moved to suppress this evidence, arguing that his wife's consent to search the computer was not valid under the holding in Georgia v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:43 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Not long after, the wife allegedly informed one of the realtors that the defendants weren’t selling the home after all; the wife would buy out the husbands interest and continue living there. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:58 am
Even though the wife did not know or approve of her husband using her car for a tryst with a prostitute, the car was sized and the forfeiture upheld. [read post]