Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: A. C., A CHILD" Results 3541 - 3560 of 4,774
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2022, 12:12 pm by gabrielagendreau
Interested candidates should submit letters of interest and statements of qualifications by March 18, 2022 to: Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi, c/o Robyn Burlingham | 1485 Mno-Bmadzewen Way | Fulton, Michigan 49052 | ATTN: Waséyabek Development Company, L.L.C. | With Copy to: Waséyabek Development Company, L.L.C. | 16 Monroe Center Drive NE, Suite 200 | Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503 | ATTN:… [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 1:38 pm by Daphne Keller
Many major platforms rely on duplicate-detection filters like PhotoDNA to find child sexual abuse images or videos, and to find violent extremist images or videos. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Abandoning or exposing a child when the life of that child is or is likely to be injured or endangered. 9. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 12:20 pm
During the next five years, the parties had substantial ongoing conflict over custody, child support and other issues. . . . [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 12:35 pm by Jordan Gold
  What does it mean for defence lawyers charged with defending accused and this public interest? [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:09 am by Susan Brenner
I found the use of the statute here interesting. [read post]
  Eligible businesses and entities include small businesses with fewer than 500 employees, select types of businesses with fewer than 1,500 employees, 501(c)(3) non-profits with fewer than 500 workers, and some 501(c)(19) veteran organizations. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Sansome, and they had one child together. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:51 pm by Einhorn Barbarito
The trustee, considering his fiduciary obligation to the beneficiaries, would determine whether the client’s offer to buy the policy is in the best interests of the beneficiaries. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:51 pm by Einhorn Harris
The trustee, considering his fiduciary obligation to the beneficiaries, would determine whether the client’s offer to buy the policy is in the best interests of the beneficiaries. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:51 pm by Einhorn Barbarito
The trustee, considering his fiduciary obligation to the beneficiaries, would determine whether the client’s offer to buy the policy is in the best interests of the beneficiaries. [read post]
7 May 2021, 8:53 am by Monica Williamson
  PLEASE NOTE: Willing to consider Rule 39(C) Applicants. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 4:02 am by Peter Mahler
When viewed in the context of a parent-child relationship, the handling of ownership interests over time could be given a rational explanation. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 7:00 am by Bill Eddy
Narcissistic personalities are often developed: A) because of biological tendencies present before birth; B) as a defense mechanism against child abuse or an insecure “attachment” with one or more parent figures; or C) from being overly-empowered as a child without normal social limits or responsibilities. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:47 am by Julie Hudson
Step 1: A Levels or equivalent You need to have a minimum of two A levels or equivalent qualifications at a minimum Grade C or above. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The other highly significant case is Google Spain v AEPD and Mario Costeja Gonzalez [2014] C-131/12 which was handed down by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice on 14 May 2014. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
Clause 21 would amend s.10 of the Contempt of Court 1981 to provide, in relation to “journalistic sources” (see cl.37(1) & Sch.5, para.1(3) to the Bill), that before requiring a person to disclose, or finding a person guilty of contempt of court for refusing to disclose, the identity of a journalistic source, the court would have to be satisfied not only that such disclosure was necessary in the interests of justice or national security or for the prevention of crime or… [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 11:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Only, "[c]ertain of Plaintiff's biological half siblings were able to see [their] identit[ies] through the DNA website[s]. [read post]