Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: S. M., A CHILD"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 5,730
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am
Pennsylvania, 11-1407, involving whether a child’s statements in an interview with a child protection agency worker about the suspicion of past abuse are “testimonial” for purposes of the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 5:42 pm
I’m learning a lot of interesting law, meeting lots of really nice people, learning the language… I’m really glad I came, and as an American student I’m being made to feel very welcome at the school, in the city, and in the country. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 6:14 am
Searching to help a nanny sentenced to death for the murder of a child, her defense attorney visits the child’s mother, who is “not without fault” in the death. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 6:51 am
After balancing those interests, the court determined that the brokers’ interests “marginally” favored the Idaho forum. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 10:37 am
Meyer stated that the purpose of the interview was to establish [Rogozin]'s admissibility into the United States, and to prevent the entry of contraband such as child pornography. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Too many clients read the parenting time statute — in Arizona, 25-403.01 — and make a snap decision that what they’re asking for is “in the child’s best interest” and don’t make much of a further analysis on that issue. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Too many clients read the parenting time statute — in Arizona, 25-403.01 — and make a snap decision that what they’re asking for is “in the child’s best interest” and don’t make much of a further analysis on that issue. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
There are also difficulties with child care and a lack of confidence in child care and those types of things. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 7:08 pm
Again, I'm thinking your daughters might have a few interesting thoughts on whether they think having equal rights is so horribly liberal.3. [read post]
13 May 2016, 7:53 am
I suspect not, but I’m not sure. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 7:24 pm
Gorny, Ph.D., Kathryn M. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:10 am
Interested parties can consult the slides.)Holt: I don’t think this is good at all. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:14 am
The trial court sanctioned Christina M. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 4:02 pm
Child predators could potentially gather enough information with tags to pose a threat. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:15 am
(I’m not sure it has to be a brand in the TM sense as long as it’s a type.) [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 2:58 am
I’m not. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 10:05 am
It cannot be stripped out of context as a stand-alone superright with the power to elevate the interests of some over others. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
The Court makes plain in its closing paragraphs that: Given the constitutional dimensions of the “fundamental liberty interest of natural parents in the care, custody, and management of their child,” Santosky v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:59 am
In asking the court to reconsider its order granting the motion to suppress, the federal prosecutor(s) argued that the district court judge committed a significant error of law in finding that [Riccio] retained any possessory interest in his computer after Officer Campbell opened a file on the computer and discovered child pornography. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:59 pm
It’s true! [read post]
