Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 11,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2008, 12:14 am
State Farm appeal. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
Do Italians really got what sharing services among EU Member States is about, she wonders? [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:56 am
Also, the report doesn’t mention that the initial interest confusion doctrine has been waning in courts for the past decade. * Paragraph 48 quotes the risk of searcher confusion from Bihari v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
" Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
" Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 3:54 pm
Such finality exists in the interests of ‘the stability of legal relations’ (today’s judgment, para. 116; in other words, legal certainty), and thus in the interests of all the parties (ibid.), and ultimately the rule of law itself (see ibid., para. 116 in fine, and Hornsby v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:48 am
The "law and society" scholars of the 1960s, did have Phd's (in many cases) and solid social science tool kits, but they were largely based outside of law schools and only penetrated in a few distinct schools (Wisconsin, Berkeley, Buffalo, Denver, Miami, perhaps a few others).Empirical LawyeringAs I argued in a UC Davis Law Review article on the 40th anniversary of Katz v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:40 am
A few recent news reports dealing with this aspect can be found here here and here.From a perusal of the 2014 [Animal Welfare Board of India v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:40 am
A few recent news reports dealing with this aspect can be found here here and here.From a perusal of the 2014 [Animal Welfare Board of India v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 10:43 am
They are: State of Nevada et al v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:43 am
Furthermore, the Supreme Court have recognized that natural parents have a fundamental liberty interest in the care, custody, and management of their children that does not evaporate, Santosky v Kramer. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
District Court in Boston under the name of Gill v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:59 pm
Bently's argument that the focus in eBay v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 5:38 am
In the reported decision of P.H. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
John RobertsonWhole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 8:43 am
The last six weeks have seen some important or at least interesting decisions under the Fair Housing Act and Title III of the ADA. [read post]
1 May 2009, 9:02 am
However, very few advertisements were sold. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm
There have been relatively few decisions on US maritime priority disputes in recent years, because these cases tend to settle. [read post]
