Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 9,820
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
Apparently, under the Weeks decision, it is adequate for a trial judge to answer a jury’s question about the meaning of an instruction by simply re-reading the language of the original instruction. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
Apparently, under the Weeks decision, it is adequate for a trial judge to answer a jury’s question about the meaning of an instruction by simply re-reading the language of the original instruction. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
Apparently, under the Weeks decision, it is adequate for a trial judge to answer a jury’s question about the meaning of an instruction by simply re-reading the language of the original instruction. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 9:34 am
The conference was held in late May, and although it initially looked like Tirien Steinbach would be joining the panel, she ultimately had to withdraw due to family obligations.The session was not designed as a faux-debate, where panelists are chosen to represent "the two sides of the issue. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 5:30 am
“We’re researchers, too! [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 8:24 pm
So we’re good to go. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
And rather than imagine that we’re going to craft a map that will change how judges do their work, the work of interpretive theory, in my view, is to understand the order at which the actual practice happens, and model the practice based on that.Beyond theory skepticism, however, my response to Solum is more fundamental. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 10:26 am
Statutes or orders consolidating these cases must provide judges with enough resources, and leave judges with enough discretion, to ensure that claims can be resolved -- either within the designated "event court" or without -- fairly and efficiently. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 10:31 am
This is due in large part to the fact that the very branch of government that violates the seventh amendment’s checks and balances system is the same branch of government that the seventh amendment was designed to check and balance. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 4:43 pm
An appeal on a personal injury case, where the appellants' primary complaint was about the conduct of the judge, who asked questions of a witness that the appellants argued were designed to enhance the complainant's credibility. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 11:06 pm
In his FAC, Plaintiff has, for the most part, taken the claims previously rejected by Judge Fogel and re-asserted them against GMAC. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:23 am
Any subsequent statement taken in violation of Miranda should be excluded by the judge. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
See also In re Kearney, 174 N.C. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
See also In re Kearney, 174 N.C. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:39 am
Citing In re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings Threshold Criteria) [2013] 1 WLR 1911, Kerr LJ considered that the issues which justify a very high hurdle for an appeal on an issue of primary fact apply (though with somewhat less force) in relation to an appeal regarding evaluation of facts. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 8:13 am
Of course, it probably didn't hurt that Judge Baylson is also the author of Colacicco v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 11:02 am
And we’re forced to contort the law enforcement approach when we attempt to make it answer and deal with questions it was never designed to deal with. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:18 am
Today, of course, someone would just file a lawsuit and have the judges order that result. [read post]
11 Nov 2006, 9:16 am
"Fact: The main thing we’re looking for from potential jurors is the ability to be open to both sides of a debate. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 6:45 am
See In re Visa Check/Mastermoney Antitrust Litig., 280 F.3d 124 (2d Cir. 2001). [read post]
