Search for: "In Re Doe's Adoption" Results 3541 - 3560 of 11,809
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2016, 6:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In Re: Mccormick & Company, Inc., Pepper Products Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation, 2016 WL 6078250, No. 15-cv-2188 (D.D.C. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:56 pm by Florian Mueller
The ITC does not appear to be too interested in it at this stage, but HTC will probably re-raise this issue at the enforcement stage should an import ban issue and be enforced after the closing of the Microsoft-Nokia deal. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
But does Merpel's view of the judge's reasoning actually constitute a fair reflection of today's depressing weather? [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
   But what it also does is to strengthen the re conceptualization of employees as servants not merely of the employer (their private law masters) but also strengthen the notion that employees may also be servants of the state (their public law masters). [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:36 pm
Patents and trade secrets are complementary, providing the subject matter of protection does not overlap. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:04 am
  Is this different from, say, a record of deportation, which most courts do not treat as testimonial when offered in a prosecution for illegal re-entry? [read post]
5 May 2023, 12:04 pm by Sandra Park
How does the Fair Housing Act promote more inclusive communities? [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 12:00 pm by Larry Catá Backer
  [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] The OECD has done a fairly good job of information gathering since the adoption of the MNE Guidelines in 2000. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:44 am by Jeremy
This also has an interesting temporal and res judicata implication. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:05 pm
“But a top-to-bottom re-examination of whether patents and other forms of intellectual property protection actually do their job, and even whether they deserve to exist, is long overdue. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:20 am by Marty Lederman
  Therefore the Court has a “duty” to adopt it. [read post]