Search for: "Louisiana Supreme Court"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 6,292
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2014, 7:39 am
While the Supreme Court has upheld such roadblocks (despite the lack of reasonable suspicion or probable cause to believe a crime has been committed) others would call it a public service by alerting those who have committed no crime and believe that this type of police conduct violates their civil liberties. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:54 am
When the Supreme Court misrepresented federal law in Kennedy v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 7:25 am
This again points up the need for the Supreme Court to resolve the split, or for Congress to amend the statute. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:56 am
Harry Reid’s chief of staff, Susan McCue, has won legal challenges in New Jersey and Pennsylvania over the past year to enforce the Supreme Court ruling permitting unlimited corporate and union spending. [read post]
1 May 2014, 2:21 pm
But after a wild and unbelievable litigation path – which involved a lawmaker threatening to impeach the state supreme court and the governor asserting that she was not required to follow the supreme court's ruling – the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled that the execution could proceed in a cloud of secrecy. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:00 pm
Both had been filed in early 1970 and had then come before special three-judge district courts from which direct appeal to the Supreme Court was possible following the panels’ denials of injunctive relief. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:55 am
Supreme Court decision Taylor v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:13 pm
In Illinois, the state supreme court recently refused to review a state appellate court’s decision that held at-will employment may be valid consideration for a non-compete agreement only if the employee is actually employed for at least two years after signing the agreement. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:13 pm
In Illinois, the state supreme court recently refused to review a state appellate court’s decision that held at-will employment may be valid consideration for a non-compete agreement only if the employee is actually employed for at least two years after signing the agreement. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 8:12 pm
The trial court disagreed and granted a summary judgment motion that threw out the case, a ruling that the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded was proper. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 4:46 am
Grant Parish School Board, Louisiana Supreme Court, Feb. 14, 2014] Tweet Tags: judges, LouisianaDissents that read like dissents is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 7:05 am
Louisiana, decided just six years before Plessy v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:20 am
The Supreme Court may find a legal way to shut it down. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:05 pm
By convention the business/defense side isn’t fond of jury trial while plaintiff’s side sings its praises, but Louisiana fight might turn that image on its head [Hayride, sequel at TortsProf (measure fails)] Generous tort law, modern industrial economy, doing away with principle of limited liability: pick (at most) two of three [Megan McArdle] Fallacies about Stella Liebeck McDonald’s hot coffee case go on and on, which means correctives need to keep coming too [Jim… [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 11:24 am
Supreme Court ruled they are unconstitutional in a case involving the Lone Star State. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:42 am
Louisiana. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
In his column for Bloomberg View, Cass Sunstein identifies his “most overrated” Supreme Court Justice. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:58 am
For example, the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana held that defendants could not rely on the “real party in interest” inquiry articulated in the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Mississippi ex rel. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 10:02 am
Wainwright, the Supreme Court mandated the right to counsel in federal and state criminal proceedings. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 8:24 am
<> VA Supreme Court Protects Climate Scientists' Private Emails - The University of Virginia (UVA) doesn't have to release the private emails of climate scientists like Michael Mann -- university was correct in defining deliberative records as "proprietary." [read post]
