Search for: "MATTER OF R L T"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 3,899
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am
Peck – A Worthy Addition to Your Summer Reading List – http://bit.ly/Oxk9F5 (Leah R. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
“[T]he Delaware lawyer who appears in an action always remains responsible to the Court for the case and its presentation,” without reference to who drafted the document at issue or was responsible for certain actions. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
LAMMERTSE, MARY L. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 3:16 pm
Cont'l Cas. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
L. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:39 pm
How do we get new skills, and I started everyone, I don’t know. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
E. coli bacteria: what are they, where did they come from, and why are some so dangerous? [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 2:52 pm
Suthers, Attorney General, Rhonda L. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 8:38 am
If we can’t make our preferences known how can we make sure that our wishes will be respected? [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:22 am
L. 92-603, 86 Stat. 1396. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:46 pm
Idea Group, Inc., 964 F.2d 131, 140 (2d Cir. 1992); Latman, Probative Similarity as Proof of Copying: Toward Dispelling Some Myths in Copyright Infringement, 90 Columbia L. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
As an initial matter, the Pfizer court noted that nowhere in Hanover Shoe does the Supreme Court analyze the phrase “damages sustained,” and that opinion does not stand for the proposition that the federal antitrust laws were intended to include any amount plaintiff was overcharged even if the full amount was passed on to a subsequent purchaser. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
’ not descriptive as a matter of law: Zobmondo Entertainment, LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 10:13 am
” If the communication is utterly devoid of substance — e.g., “Damn [Group X]” — then it shouldn’t be entitled to protection. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 5:59 am
http://t.co/aep7bawL4a -> TripAdvisor’s “Dirtiest Hotels” List Isn’t Defamatory—Seaton v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
In The Amiable Nancy, 16 U.S. 546, 557-58 (1818) the Court stated that "[t]he jurisdiction of the district court to entertain this suit, by virtue of its general admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, and independent of the special provisions of the prize act of the 26th of June 1812…has been so repeatedly decided by this court, that it cannot be permitted again to be judicially brought into doubt. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:27 pm
"); Chau, 771 F.3d at 129 ("[T]he epithets … 'sucker,' 'fool,' 'frontman,' 'industrial waste,' … and 'crooks or morons' … are hyperbole and therefore not actionable opinion. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 2:59 pm
[T]he “irreducible constitutional minimum” of standing consists of three elements. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech Engineering v Garth Living Pty Ltd (Patentology) (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Prison for infringement of IP rights in Australia! [read post]
