Search for: "Mark C. Good" Results 3541 - 3560 of 5,964
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2013, 2:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  When asked “What is the first thing that comes to your mind when you hear the name ‘Charbucks,’ spelled C‐H‐A‐R‐B‐U‐C‐K‐S? [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am by Bexis
[C]ourts and the FDA have recognized the propriety and potential public value of unapproved or off-label drug use.United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
MN : West, c2013.TZ2 .SH19 2013 Constitutional Law A short & happy guide to constitutional law / by Mark C. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 10:51 am by Ron Coleman
I’m riding the stock all the way — when you got a position like I do (ten shares), you don’t want to go and panic the market… UPDATE:  From Reuters “news” service, March 2010: The European Court of Justice (ECJ) said on Tuesday advertisers were free to buy keywords identical to trademarks of rivals as long as consumers were not confused on the provenance of goods and services by the way ads were displayed online. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am by John Elwood
  Tuesday also marked the end of the line for Unger v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Reg. 67985, 67988-89 (FDA Nov. 13, 2013) (discussing “recent court decisions”).We turn to the FDA’s cost benefit “analysis” (use of quotation marks intentional), which consists of only one paragraph, so we’ll quote it in full:The economic benefits to the public health from adoption of the proposed rule are not quantified. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
” Id. at 334 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:14 am
  L'Oreal argued that the decoded goods did not conform to its quality control standards and differed materially from genuine goods. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
The KVH service mark was abandoned, while the KVH trade mark was registered 2011. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:08 am
  The court adopts a position long taken by the FDA itself:The FD & C Act does not, however, limit the manner in which a physician may use an approved drug. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
Applicant argued that the nature of the involved goods is “irrelevant,” as are all the other duPont factors (except one), because the marks are so different. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 2:01 pm by Charon QC
The Independent So, Lord Chancellor…everything going to Plan A or Plan B… or Plan C…? [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 2:01 pm by Charon QC
The Independent So, Lord Chancellor…everything going to Plan A or Plan B… or Plan C…? [read post]