Search for: "Matter of G. C. ," Results 3541 - 3560 of 4,013
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm by Armand Grinstajn
However, this result does not necessarily imply the above mentioned negative feature. [2.2.6] This negative feature therefore adds subject-matter extending beyond the content of the application as filed. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:02 am by Michael Geist
  Bills C-46 and C-47 languished, however, and have yet to be discussed at committee. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
Cir. 2009) ("Because Lonza sought to introduce the testimony of an alleged prior inventor under § 102(g) for the purpose of invalidating a patent, Lonza was required to produce evidence corroborating Dr. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:09 pm by Garry J. Wise, Wise Law Office, Toronto
The Defence of Responsible Communication on Matters of Public Importance [28] In Grant, at para. 126, we hold that the defence of responsible communication on matters of public interest applies where: A) The publication is on a matter of public interest, and B) The publisher was diligent in trying to verify the allegation, having regard to: a) the seriousness of the allegation; b) the public importance of the matter; c) the urgency of the matter;… [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 1:06 am by Michael Geist
   The publisher was diligent in trying to verify the allegation, having regard to: (a)   the seriousness of the allegation; (b)   the public importance of the matter; (c)   the urgency of the matter; (d)   the status and reliability of the source; (e)   whether the plaintiff's side of the story was sought and accurately reported; (f)    whether the inclusion of the defamatory statement was… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 6:20 pm by David Doniger
  The agreement isn’t enough to keep us under 2 degrees C. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:19 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
(c) Fraud: Defendants argued that Plaintiffs were improperly bootstrapping a fraud claim to a breach of contract claim by asserting that Defendants never intended to honor their agreement. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:53 pm
Scott Rothstein, et al; *Amended Razorback Funding Complaint (from Miami Herald); *Lawsuit filed by Razorback Funding against TD Bank; Andrew Barnett; Scott Rothstein; Debra Villegas; David Boden; Frank Spinosa; Jennifer Kerstetter; Rosanne Caretsky and Frank Preve; *Exhibits Q through FF (without Y) to Razorback Funding lawsuit; *Todd Snyder's Complaint against Scott Rothstein, RRA and TD Bank; Carolina Casualty Malpractice Rescission Complaint *Complaint; *Exhibit A; *Exhibit B; *Exhibit… [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 11:38 am by James Hamilton
According to Treasury, the lack of a federal regulatory regime and resolution authority for large systemic non-bank financial institutions contributed to the financial crisis and, unless addressed with legislation, will constrain a federal response to future crises (Title I, Subtitle G). [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:09 am by James Morphy, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP,
Currently, Item 10(c) of Regulation S-K permits, but does not require, registrants to disclose in registration statements and periodic reports the credit ratings assigned to classes of debt securities, convertible debt securities and preferred stock. [read post]