Search for: "Morgan Stanley "
Results 3541 - 3560
of 3,680
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2007, 7:16 pm
Related post: The Blackstone IPO: Regulatory Arbitrage Blackstone's S-1 describes an intriguing tax structure, and it promises a tax opinion from Simpson Thacher. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 10:58 am
Proposals have already been withdrawn at American Electric Power, American Express, Baker Hughes, Burlington Northern, Costco Wholesale, Dean Foods, El Paso, General Dynamics, Morgan Stanley, Office Max, Sears, Sprint Nextel, Williams Company, Unit Corp., U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 2:19 am
Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 7:42 am
Appeals Court Tosses $1.58 Billion Verdict Against Morgan Stanley", Miami Daily Business Review, Mar. 22; Carolyn Elefant, LegalBlogWatch, Mar. 21; opinion text, PDF). [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 7:05 am
The New York Times reports today that "Morgan Stanley Net Jumps; Appeal on Lawsuit Is Won. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 3:13 am
Morgan Stanley Inc. won a reversal of the $1.58 billion verdict handed to billionaire Ron Perelman for misleading him in a deal to sell Coleman Co. to Sunbeam Corp. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 2:27 am
Investor Ronald Perelman won $1.58 billion in compensatory and punitive damages from investment bank Morgan Stanley on a fraud claim in 2005 in large part because the firm's e-mail production was so bad that the trial judge finally ordered a... [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 1:36 am
Appeals Court Tosses $1.58 Billion Verdict Against Morgan Stanley
Daily Business Review
A Florida appeals court threw out one of the largest verdicts in U.S. history Wednesday when it overturned a $1.58 billion judgment against financial behemoth Morgan Stanley. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 12:11 am
The plaintifff company claimed Morgan Stanley lured it to purchase the ultimately worthless shares of Sunbeam, Inc. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 8:58 pm
Appeals Court Tosses $1.58 Billion Verdict Against Morgan Stanley; Panel did not rule on judge's controversial ruling based on Morgan Stanley's violation of her discovery orders. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 6:31 pm
Meanwhile, Morgan Stanley had been ordered to pay a mere $15 million to resolve a U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:48 pm
Morgan Stanley received some good news today: A Florida appeals court overturned a $1.57 billion award against the investment bank for defrauding billionaire investor Ron Perelman by concealing material information from him in the course of handling the sale of... [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:37 pm
On a topic other than SharePoint...It appears that the $1.58 billion verdict was overturned because of the plaintiff's inability to prove damages, despite the fact that the judge precluded any defense on liability. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 3:30 pm
The Associated Press is reporting: Now available online is an article headlined "Morgan Stanley-Perelman Judgment Flipped. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 2:29 pm
[JURIST] The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal [official website] on Wednesday overturned [opinion text, PDF ] a $1.58 billion 2005 jury verdict awarded to billionaire financier and Revlon [corporate website] chairman Ron Perelman [corporate profile], finding that the plaintiffs failed to prove compensatory damages. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 2:00 pm
" Bloomberg News reports that "Morgan Stanley Wins on Perelman's $1.57 Billion Award. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:11 pm
Thus, the court reversed the verdict, and remanded the case to the lower court with instructions to enter judgment for Morgan Stanley. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:07 pm
Morgan Stanley & Co. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 10:56 am
Courtesy of The Wall Street Journal Law Blog is a story about the reversal by an appellate court in Florida of a 2005 jury verdict of over $1 billion in damages against Morgan Stanley in connection with its "supporting role"... [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 10:56 am
Courtesy of The Wall Street Journal Law Blog is a story about the reversal by an appellate court in Florida of a 2005 jury verdict of over $1 billion in damages against Morgan Stanley in connection with its "supporting role"... [read post]
