Search for: "Motion" Results 3541 - 3560 of 152,934
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2011, 7:30 am by Eric Schweibenz
Both CSP and the Commission Investigative Staff (“OUII”) opposed the motion. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:54 am by Robert Vrana
Finally, Judge Stark addressed Google’s motions in limine. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
This Reply answers the State's Response to Motion for Release, which itself answered Adnan's Motion for Release Pending Appeal. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 1:41 pm by Pilar G. Kraman
Andrews recently considered several motions filed by defendant Intel, including a Daubert motion to exclude plaintiff’s damages expert, a motion in limine to exclude damages testimony of an inventor of the patent in suit, and a motion for summary judgment of no damages. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:50 am by Matt Conigliaro
The motion’s first paragraph simply stated, “Oh. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 12:04 pm
Weed, there are several key motions pending at this point:-defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint; and-defendant's motion for leave to interpose counterclaims.Additionally, the parties were able to reach agreement on a stipulated protective order for an examination of the defendant's hard drive.Motion to dismiss complaint*Opposition papers*Reply papers*Supplemental authority submitted by defendant*RIAA response to supplemental authority*Motion… [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Roger Parloff
Transfers of venue, as such motions are called, are notoriously difficult to obtain. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 12:24 pm by Peter Howard Tilem
Despite the different testimonies by the officers, the court denied the defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 7:25 am by Carabin & Shaw, P.C.
The Court’s Decision The court determined that the lower court was correct to grant the defendant’s motion. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The defendant, GSK, filed a motion in this federal district court claiming that the lawsuit was pre-empted by federal law under the U.S. [read post]