Search for: "People v David S."
Results 3541 - 3560
of 5,861
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
But in Coleman v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:57 am
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s Len Boselovic covers Sandifer v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:35 pm
Richard v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm
For more, read David Fathi’s blog and our press release. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:52 am
At his Arizona Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog, Lawrence Koplow wrote about Arizona State Hospital v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The case, Clapper v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:28 am
” That part of Sasktchewan’s law goes too far and was ruled unconstitutional.The case, Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm
In 2011 he featured at number 17 in the MediaGuardian’s 100 most powerful people in media, the paper suggesting that his rulings had “shaped UK libel and privacy law, and in the process made him the country’s most controversial high court judge”. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:52 pm
Our favorite group of people has voted to end debate on Chuck Hagel’s nomination, reports Sara Murray at the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:03 am
The American Constitution Society has posted the video from last week’s event: A Look at Shelby County: The Future of the Voting Rights Act and an issue brief by David H. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:35 am
Heather Lynn Hannay v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
In his Verdict column for Justia, Vikram David Amar analyzes the issue of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG)’s standing in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
It “would allow people to collect damages from someone who photographs them in an offensive way during their personal or family time“, reports AP (at Politico). [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Real people make this stuff. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:20 am
At Balkinization, David Gans of the Constitutional Accountability Center discusses an amicus brief filed by constitutional law scholars in Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 9:17 pm
Greene v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Riggs v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:34 am
Against the back drop of Dred Scott v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
Justice Kittredge, writing for a unanimous court, (and in an opinion footnoted as heavily as a David Foster Wallace essay) affirmed the trial court's grant of summary judgment to the Town of Mt. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Although each member of Congress certainly has his or her own nuanced understanding of the Constitution, the model for constitutional interpretation for many conservatives on Capitol Hill is Justice Scalia, who is well known for his commitment to textualism—to applying the text of the document as “intelligent and informed people of the time” of the document’s enactment would have. [read post]
