Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 52,397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2013, 2:19 am
For a 220+ year old book, the text is pretty clean for the most part, and I’ve been adding images to older cases, such as Price v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
That emphasis came as a surprise because in two cases in recent years--Matal v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 3:24 pm
Well yes, but this should be happening anyway (see K v K wherein the Court of Appeal said ‘Woah, woah, woah – that’s not quite what we meant in H-N. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:14 pm
In Risko v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
In Herrera v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 1:31 pm
People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:38 am
People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 7:18 am
Circuit indicated that over 1,500 people listened to the July 12, 2019, oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:05 pm
Wayfair, and by Jennifer Mascott on the government-structure case Lucia v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 11:10 am
In the case of Mesić v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:17 pm
In Castillo v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 2:15 pm
In fact, the Supreme Court has been condemning racial bias in jury selection in capital cases since 1880 when it outlawed the practice in Strauder v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:55 am
Nearly two decades ago, the Supreme Court found in Reno v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:07 am
Consider this case: A Florida court sent Natoya Cunningham to prison for eight years on the say of just six people. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:45 am
LATFOR case dropped their challenge of the state law ending prison-based gerrymandering. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 1:49 pm
The case is still ongoing.Three times the trial court previously entered judgment in favor of the defendant. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 6:27 pm
Today’s case is Tarasoff v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:22 pm
In Arista Records v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:04 pm
Certainly under the facts of this case, the MV--50 form is not a 'written instrument'. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 6:15 am
But it's not 1973 anymore.The case is Chase Group Alliance LLC v. [read post]
