Search for: "Qui Tam" Results 3541 - 3560 of 4,759
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2021, 12:39 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Act now to Reach Experienced Qui Tam Whistle Blower Lawyers  With offices in Chicago, Elmhurst and Wilmette, we’re proud to offer more than thirty years of experience in a vast range of business law disputes and especially in the area of class action whistle blower and qui tam disputes. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:24 am by Andrea Gold
As illustrated by Anchor Mortgage, the answer to this question can have a significant impact on the monies received by the government and, in turn, qui tam whistleblowers. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 11:49 am by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
Based in Chicago and Oak Brook, Ill., our Joliet and Schaumburg area qui tam and False Claims Act lawyers stand ready to represent whistleblowers throughout the United States — regardless of whether prosecutors have decided to join the lawsuit. [read post]
13 May 2010, 4:26 am by Jon L. Gelman
Under the qui tam or whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act, a private citizen, known as a "relator," can sue on behalf of the United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 8:55 am by anne
  In addition, the PHEW Act allows for whistleblowers to file qui tam actions and receive a share of any government recovery. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 10:43 am by greggshapiro.admin
Gregg Shapiro represents whistleblowers in False Claims Act qui tam cases involving Medicare fraud and other matters. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:37 am by fraudfighters
The off-label civil settlement resolves four separate lawsuits that were filed under the qui-tam provisions of the False Claims Act. [read post]
A qui tam Plaintiff, David Sherwin, filed an action against the defendant, Office Depot, Inc., to recover damages and civil penalties pursuant to the California False Claims Act (“CFCA”). [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 11:32 am by Melissa Tremblay
Under the terms of the government settlement announced today, these defendants collectively will pay $6 million to resolve allegations of genetic testing fraud brought in multiple FCA qui tam cases filed by several whistleblowers, including clients of WLC. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:24 pm by Jason Rantanen
  This type of language is called a "qui tam" provision, by which the government  essentially asigns its rights to a private party (the qui tam "relator"). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 1:00 pm by Anna Haac
  And for the second consecutive year, over 700 whistleblower lawsuits were brought under the FCA’s qui tam provision, approximately twice the average during the years 2000-2009. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 10:10 am by luiza
The allegations originated in a lawsuit brought by two whistleblowers under the qui tam provisions of the FCA; the government had announced its decision to intervene in the whistleblowers’ qui tam case in 2018. [read post]
15 May 2009, 12:00 pm
Based in Chicago and near Wheaton, Ill., we handle qui tam claims at the local, state and federal levels in Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin and nationwide. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 12:58 am
Clarifies a split between Circuit Courts of Appeal as to when a government employee may act as a qui tam relator under the FCA. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 7:28 am by Altman & Altman
That attorney will file something known as a False Claims Act qui tam action against the facility. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 1:40 pm by Greene LLP
The settlement, likely to exceed $231 million once interest is calculated, brought to an end the whistleblower suit initiated by Greene LLP and client Mark McGuire in January 2012 under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 10:42 am by luiza
  Faced with a non-intervened qui tam, defendants pile discovery requests on the government. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:27 am by Ben Vernia
Though the case may seem to have limited impact on cases filed after March, 2010, Justice Ginsburg’s call for Congressional action demonstrates that the real battleground lies elsewhere: she highlights the Court’s hostility to declined qui tam suits, and in reference to Fed. [read post]