Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 3541 - 3560 of 9,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court on April 23, representing the United States in a criminal sentencing case. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:35 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
” Francisco argued that a “good cause” limit on the power to remove officers of the United States conflicts with the power the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The Protocol allows the highest national courts of Member States to pose questions to the Court on the interpretation and application of Convention rights in pending cases. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:07 am by Ken White
Listen to it at Legal Talk Network or stream right here: Some resources from this episode: United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Ed Stein
(As discussed in an earlier post, some argue that the review provision runs afoul of Immigration and Naturalization Service v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The Supreme Court has now heard oral arguments in two gerrymandering cases this term, and the world wonders whether Justice Anthony Kennedy will at last carry through on his suggestion in 2004’s Vieth v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:18 am by John Buhl
Fifteen briefs have been filed in support of South Dakota, including by the United States government. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Hayley Evans
Last summer, tech companies followed suit, with CEOs including Elon Musk signing an Open Letter to the United Nations Convention on Certain Chemical Weapons. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by John Elwood
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 11:43 am by Jordan Brunner
The back-and-forth between the United States and China provoked a downward spiral in stock prices, and brings the countries closer to a trade war. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Judges Sri Srinivasan and Robert Wilkins considered whether the U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 10:29 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, a 1928 Supreme Court decision allowing the federal government to wiretap without a warrant – was “the great apostle of privacy, and he applied it to himself. [read post]