Search for: "Samples v. Samples" Results 3541 - 3560 of 5,707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2008, 5:49 am
Here is the abstract:The egalitarian voice of the United States Supreme Court resonates forty years after it abolished anti-miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 9:36 am by Dennis Crouch
And, these are the patents and applications that are most likely to be affected by the decision in Bilski v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:47 pm by Doug Reiser
The combination of recent alcohol poisoning and the difficulty of regulating a small sample of a particular type of product (“energy” drinks v. caffeine-added drinks) might require the LCB to enact a more sweeping regulation. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 11:42 am by WSLL
The Operational Checklist, which was prepared contemporaneously with the breath test, showed that Appellant was observed for the eighteen-minute period that elapsed between 12:33 a.m., when the officer checked his mouth, and 12:51 a.m., when his first breath sample was taken. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 5:35 am
”Trimega commercialised the technological breakthrough of analysing human hair samples for alcohol, firmly believing that just as hair testing had become accepted by the industry as the ‘gold standard’ for analysis of drug abuse, hair testing for alcohol would receive similar recognition once it had been shown to be very accurate. [read post]
2 May 2007, 4:47 pm
While right-of-reply laws may be stymied by Miami Herald v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 2:46 pm by Brad
  As the Arkansas Supreme Court put it in the case of Johnson v. [read post]