Search for: "Samsung" Results 3541 - 3560 of 6,704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2012, 9:30 pm by Glenn
Samsung: Tweets from the Courtroom http://t.co/z6Lwa3tT 21:15:08, 2012-07-31 Here we go. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:13 pm by Eric Schweibenz
In support of its motion, Spansion relied upon the deposition testimony of Complainant Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 3:30 am by Pam Samuelson
This is due in no small part to the epic battle between Apple and Samsung over Apple’s claim that Samsung’s phones infringed some of Apple’s design patents. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 8:36 am by Phil
Apple suffered a setback Nov. 30 when a higher Australian court overturned the ruling against Samsung. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 11:50 am
Apple is asserting the same patent against Samsung in Germany, as well. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 12:13 pm
The Commission has identified the following as respondents in this investigation: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, California ASUStek Computer, Inc. of Taiwan ASUS Computer International of Fremont, California Dell, Inc. of Round Rock, Texas Lenovo… [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 5:54 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Supreme Court Exclusive: Apple-Samsung juror speaks out | Apple - CNET News Apple's patent victory may reshape smartphone market - Business - CBC News  Based on Donations, N.H.L.'s American Owners Prefer Republican Candidates Apple Beats Samsung: First Reactions Was the $675,000 damage award against Joel Tenenbaum for file sharing excessive? [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 9:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  (But it’s plausible that consumers would think that Vanna White endorsed Samsung because a letter-turning blonde robot appeared in its ads?) [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 2:45 am
Perhaps her readers know.Late change: after posting, this Kat found a link sent in by Katfriend Lawrence Ryz to this news item from the BBC: it seems that Samsung is the target and that the patent is for a steering mechanism [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 1:28 pm
The High Court found that such services, comprising the cut and scanning of books per client’s request, amount to copyright infringement.Moving to designs, Paul Tjiam and Hidde Koenraad recaps on MARQUES Class99 the decision issued by the District Court of the Hague in the consolidated cases Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Maxperian NL BV and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Digital Revolution BV [ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2016:14383, para 4.74], which held that toner cartridges can be… [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:13 am by Florian Mueller
In December 2012, the Commission pressured Samsung into dropping any pending requests for SEP injunctions against Apple. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 6:49 am by Florian Mueller
Apple Needs an Obama Intervention", referring to the otherwise-imminent U.S. import ban of older iPhones and iPads (over a FRAND-pledged, declared-essential Samsung patent) that major industry players and, especially, four United States Senators from both sides of the aisle are also concerned about. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 8:34 am by Larry
I stared with a Samsung Windows 7 device, moved to a Nokia Lumia 920, and now carry a Lumia 950, which I keep slightly ahead of the curve through the Insiders program. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 9:46 pm by Mark Summerfield
Back in March, I reported on a decision of Justice Stephen Burley denying Pfizer an order for preliminary discovery to confirm its belief that Samsung Bioepis AU (‘SBA’) was infringing a patent covering methods of producing Pfizer’s biological medicine for treatment of autoimmune diseases marketed under the name ENBREL. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:15 am by Florian Mueller
With all that's going on in terms of antitrust investigations and lawsuits, such as the Federal Trade Commission's progress in the Northern District of California, the ITC will (either now or at a laters stage) have to give serious consideration to the competition issues surrounding Qualcomm's complaint.The following passage from Intel's statement describes the market landscape:"When it comes to cellular phones and tablets, Qualcomm's anticompetitive tactics have meant… [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 1:49 am by Mark Summerfield
  Unfortunately for Pfizer, Justice Stephen Burley has denied its application for discovery, ruling its evidence insufficient to establish a ‘reasonable belief’, as opposed to a ‘mere suspicion’, that SBA is infringing its patents relating to a process for producing etanercept: Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals v Samsung Bioepis AU Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 285. [read post]