Search for: "State v. Law" Results 3541 - 3560 of 173,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
 The complaint (full text) in American Center for Law & Justice v. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
These cases cover the rights of criminal defendants, the rights of free speech and free exercise of religion, and the powers of states. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 11:49 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The Court heard oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 11:30 am by D Daniel Sokol
Matt Mitten, Marquette University - Law School explains Why and How the Supreme Court Should Have Decided O'Bannon v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:15 pm by Kevin
United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat and 982.34 Pounds of American Paddlefish Caviar (hereinafter, United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:56 pm
Answer:          Yes, According to the United States Supreme Court in Watters, Commissioner v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:05 am
. ---: Brief for Petitioner Thomas Carr ---: Brief for National Association for Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Petitioner ---: Brief for Law Professors in Support of Petitioner Earlier case which will be tested: CALDER v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:39 pm by Laura Appleman
Everyone who teaches first-year crim inevitably teaches the two competing frameworks of the criminal law:  the common law v. the Model Penal Code.  [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am by Daniel Tokaji
Duncan/Jones Day Designated Professor of Law at Ohio State University Moritz College of Law and Senior Fellow at Election Law @ Moritz. [read post]
The court reaffirmed the 2002 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Mackin v New Brunswick, which held that the state only has limited immunity. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In a very rare outcome, in the case of R (Davis and ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin) the Divisional Court declared that the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIPA) is inconsistent with European Union law and therefore is “disapplied”, although the Court suspended the effect of its order until after 31 March 2016. [read post]