Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 61,264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V An accused person shall not be extradited, under the provisions of this Treaty, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause under the laws of the State asking extradition, he is exempt from prosecution or punishment on account of the punishable act for which extradition is asked. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
Maryland, 17 U.S. 316, 421 (1819) (stating that Congress is due deference on the means by which it accomplishes legitimate ends, but not the ends themselves). [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:51 pm
The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion when it denied the part of the motion which requested attorney fees (Difone v Difone 87 D3d 971, Taormina v Taormina 131 AD3 696). [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:07 pm
The two leading cases specifying the “compelling state interest” test – Holt v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:41 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 7:43 am
See, e.g., Shared v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:22 am
The court expressly acknowledges this result, saying: yup, that's exactly what federal preemption means. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:24 am
The Court of Appeals strikes down the law under the Equal Protection Clause.The case is Dandamudi v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:02 pm
It is a great grief to me, (meaning himself the said Seth,) to see how the poor people (meaning the people of this Sate) are oppressed by the Laws of this State, (meaning that the several Laws of this State, which require and make necessary the owning of Personal or Real Estate, as a qualification of Voters in such Meetings, were tyrannical and oppressive,) and I am determined to vindicate their cause as long as I live. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:55 am
” Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
Chochorowski, et al. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Id. at 26-27 (emphasis added) (citing Klein v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Id. at 26-27 (emphasis added) (citing Klein v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 3:49 pm
In New York State, that means 3 years.3. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 5:19 am
Additional Resources: Burgueno v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 5:19 am
Additional Resources: Burgueno v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 5:19 am
Additional Resources: Burgueno v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court decided Fernandez v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 2:02 pm
Fisher: Even if FCANCER is understood as meaning "Fuck Cancer" (rather than, say, "Fight Cancer"), the exclusion of "any plate considered offensive in nature" from the state's personalized plate program was unconstitutionally viewpoint-based and discretionary. [read post]
