Search for: "State v. Register" Results 3541 - 3560 of 13,695
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The ICO has fined Smart Home Protection Ltd £90,000 for making nuisance calls to people registered with the Telephone Preference Service (TPS). [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
DesignsRosie Burbidge published her last post as an official GuestKat, providing a tour of some recent design decisions, including Tynan v J4K Sports Ltd [2018] EWHC 3519 and Pulseon OY v Garmin (Europe) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Counsel's perspective | Mr Justice Nugee and the Superhose: The potentiality of disclosure | Dutch Court of Appeal injuncts unwilling licensee in first post-Huawei v ZTE FRAND decision | English High Court seizes patent infringement jurisdiction once again | No knowledge in secondary copyright infringement of Eminem's first album | Ariana Grande, thank you, next: copyright infringement on Instagram | DSM Directive is now Directive 2019/790 and Member States will need to… [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 12:34 pm by Tom Zagorsky
The five required sections/categories are as follows: (i) Introduction; (ii) Relationships and Services; (iii) Fees, Costs, Conflicts and Standards of Conduct; (iv) Disciplinary History; and (v) Additional Information. [read post]
In August 2016, a number of health care organizations, along with five states, challenged the definition of “on the basis of sex” in Franciscan Alliance v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down its long awaited judgment in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd & Anor [2019] UKSC 27. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:02 pm by Stephen Page
The case, Taglieri v Monasky involved a court order for the return of a child who was 2 months when taken from Italy by her mother to the US to be returned to Italy. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 6:08 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
.),  handed down on Friday alters the course of personal jurisdiction law in Pennsylvania relative to corporations.In reviewing the history of the law on this issue, the court noted that, in 2014, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Daimler AG v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Corp. v. 2319 Richmond Terrace Corp., 141 A.D.3d 626, 627, 34 N.Y.S.3d 616).Oral promise to pay credit card bills during the pendency of action unenforceable            In Novick v Novick, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2202438 (Mem), 2019 N.Y. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm by Marina Chafa
While the Lanham Act protects the owner of a registered trademark against the use of similar marks if such use is likely to result in consumer confusion, the doctrine of foreign equivalents protects consumers within the United States from confusion or deception caused by the use of terms in foreign languages. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 10:11 am by James Kachmar
This was the result in a case recently decided by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals titled: Gold Value International Textile, Inc. v. [read post]