Search for: "State v. W"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 15,636
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
My poster child: Gordon v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:59 am
The case raises the technical issue "[w]hether a lawfully admitted permanent resident who is not seeking admission to the United States can... [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
” (Last quoting Jensen v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In 1984, the Supreme Court created a now well-known “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 1:00 pm
“Drugs” are defined to include all drugs under schedules W, X, Y and Z in Maine’s Criminal Code, which includes all prescription drugs in addition to street drugs and cannabis. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 11:05 am
Brave case of first impression brings intellectually-rigorous analysis to – challenging – sentencing fact pattern.United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:50 pm
Pieces of the Amount A Puzzle Profit Margin Z Deemed Routine Profit Margin X Deemed Non-Routine Profits Y=Z-X and Y=W+V Deemed Non-Routine Profits Attributable to Markets W Deemed Non-Routine Profits Attributable to Other Factors V If, for example, the deemed routine profit margin (x) is 10 percent, and the share of deemed non-routine profits attributable to markets (w) is also 10 percent, then a company with a 20 percent profit margin (z) could expect… [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926). [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 11:06 am
It is time for the United States to stop debating whether to address it, and start talking about how to address it. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 4:35 am
Mah v 40-44 W. 120th St. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In its well-known decision of Illinois v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 5:35 am
My analysis reveals substantial variations in the frequency with which different presidents have used signing statements as a tool to exercise negative power under the Recommendations Clause: President George W. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:26 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 1:19 pm
Kagan then queried whether Arizona v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 3:59 am
Kansas v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 11:00 pm
” W. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 12:19 pm
John W. [read post]
