Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 40,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2012, 1:00 pm
(13) In other words, the Supreme Court may not have seen the last of Monroe Setser. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:16 am
The words "married child" may sound a little odd, but marriages involving minors can be entered into lawfully in Arizona and other states. [read post]
25 May 2020, 7:37 am
” Terminiello v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court quietly vacated a $7.7 million award in a wage-hour class action in Chinese Daily News v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Alabama Department of Revenue, which asks whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors from a generally applicable sales tax constitutes discrimination against railroads; and Flores-Villar v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 12:03 am
Sixth Circuit SEAL.gif On defense claim that the defendant did not affirmatively consent but only "acquiesced" to the search, defense counsel's use of the word "acquiesced" in cross-examining the officer was inadmissible under FRE 701 for attempting to force the officer to adopt a legal conclusion, in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 11:04 am
Since it's a very interesting piece of work in its own right, I'll help Name That Tune by giving a fairly expansive snippet thereof:"Four months ago, in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Because a majority of the Texas Supreme Court has the last word on the matter every time the issue comes up. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:38 am
Likewise, little has been written about the possible requirement a negative matching of mis-spelled versions of generic words also be sought. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:10 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 10:43 am
” Standard Fire furthered this argument by citing the Court to Smith v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 7:43 am
Diehl v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 2:16 pm
The state appellate court’s decision was subsequently appealed.In reaching its decision, the Louisiana Supreme Court relied on the plain and ordinary meaning of the word “flood. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 3:45 pm
In other words, Kirtsaeng stated that Wiley should not complain that he, as lawful owner of the goods, resold them here because Wiley had already received a fair return for those goods abroad. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:49 am
Frontier Petroleum Services Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 9:42 am
In U.S v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 9:42 am
In U.S v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 2:39 pm
Supreme Court's decision in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:19 am
The tweets only relayed users’ words but omitted many words in order to fit the character limits. [read post]
