Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 7,107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:44 am
The term “Alford plea” originated with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in North Carolina v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 5:10 am
The supremacy clause of the Constitution states "all Treaties. . . which shall be made. . . under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:58 am
United States, a 2006 case that he describes the Court as having “bungled. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
Hurles, 12-1472, gets lucky relist number thirteen, and at this rate will still be going strong for the Pyeongchang Olympics; the petition asks whether it is per se unreasonable for a state not to provide an evidentiary hearing on a judicial-bias claim. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 7:50 am
And looked to United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:31 pm
The first is whether the United States has sovereign immunity from the suit by virtue of the Quiet Title Act(QTA), 86 Stat. 1176. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 10:46 am
Ron Katznelson, a former Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of California in Qualcomm's home town of San Diego, told the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) in a public-interest statement that there are dozens of alternative technologies to the asserted claim 31 of U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:02 am
Related Cases: EFF v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 8:10 am
Carhart, and its decision earlier this summer in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 6:23 am
Energy United States, L.L.C., 720 F.3d 620 (5th Cir. 2013) Daniel Berman v. [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 6:05 am
United States has rightly received strong criticism from legal analysts, including me (here, and here, for example). [read post]
Senate Judiciary Committee Passes Amendment to Prohibit Prosecutions for Terms-of-Service Violations
16 Sep 2011, 11:45 am
Nosal, still pending in the Ninth Circuit) and they could not prosecute Internet users for Terms of Service violations (as they tried to do in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 5:45 am
V. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:30 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 9:46 am
On July 2, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided United Steel v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 5:11 pm
Our starting place is Entick v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 1:44 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
Emboldened by the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
