Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 11,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2011, 9:15 am
Justice Moreno then asked what impact AT&T might have on the California Supreme Court's decision in Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 6:18 am
The California appellate and Supreme Court both summarily denied relief.The petition argued that the plain language of the provision applies to any private action, just like it says, no matter if brought in state or federal court. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:27 pm
Class Action Challenging NCAA Requirement that Student Athletes Allow NCAA to use Likeness, Without Compensation, Adequately Pleaded Antitrust Violations California Federal Court Holds Two separate class action lawsuits, one by Edward O’Bannon and one by Craig Newsome, were filed against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the Collegiate Licensing Company (CLC) alleging violations of the Sherman Act, as well as state law claims for unjust… [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
While there are meaningful procedural differences to these cases – a federal district court dismissed Kuciemba for failure to state a claim, whereas the California Court of Appeal denied a writ of mandate to vacate an order overruling a demurrer in See’s – there are many factual similarities. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 1:32 pm
“The court barred them ‘from exercising editorial discretion over speech and speakers on their’ pages. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:05 pm
Section 1708.8 excludes photos taken outside of the state of California. [read post]
Congressional Homeland Security Committees Seek Ways to Support State, Federal Responses to COVID-19
9 Mar 2020, 4:42 pm
Foreign nationals who have been in China or Iran within the previous 14 days are barred from entering the U.S. altogether, pursuant to two presidential proclamations. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:42 pm
Foreign nationals who have been in China or Iran within the previous 14 days are barred from entering the U.S. altogether, pursuant to two presidential proclamations. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm
California, the Supreme Court struck down a California law that made it a crime to bring or assist in bringing into the State any indigent person who was not a California resident. 314 U.S. 160 (1941). [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 12:12 pm
Accordingly, the court finds it fits comforably within the long tradition of California's, and the states', regulation of medical practice, which further supports the court's finding it is constitutional. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 5:27 pm
Nor would they refer them to the state bar. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:28 am
The employee then petitioned for review with the California Supreme Court, which was granted. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 7:09 am
The court found that California’s butter labeling law wasn’t identical to federal labeling requirements and was therefore preempted. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:10 am
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:58 am
For example, if the district court decision were permitted to stand as issued, it could affect the exempt status of recent medical school graduates working as residents in hospitals and also first-year associates working at a law firm before receiving their bar results, as well as seasoned attorneys licensed in another state but working in California on a corporate deal or an ongoing lawsuit. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 2:39 pm
The symposium is co-sponsored by the American Society of International Law, the Junior International Law Scholars Association (JILSA), the Los Angeles County Bar Association - International Law Section, and the State Bar of California – International Law Section. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:17 am
“The state bar associations are justified by the state’s compelling government interest in regulating the practice of law before its courts,” he explained. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
Ninth Circuit: And his claim is not barred by the statute of limitations. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 5:16 am
(b) The receiver shall give an undertaking to the State of California, in such sum as the court or judge may direct, to the effect that the receiver will faithfully discharge the duties of receiver in the action and obey the orders of the court therein. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
On June 26, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
