Search for: "United States v. Justice" Results 3541 - 3560 of 32,493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2010, 6:34 am by Stephen Griffin
I doubt whether any scholar could do as well.I will devote two subsequent posts to Justice Breyer's book, one to his discussion of United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 3:31 pm by Lyle Denniston
Another precedent that some of his critics said might be vulnerable is United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:20 am by Joshua Matz
United States, in which the state has asked the Court to review the Ninth Circuit’s decision blocking enforcement of four provisions of S.B. 1070, its controversial immigration law. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:33 am
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in Arizona v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:58 pm by Ernster the Virtual Library Cat
 The audio recording and unofficial version of the transcript of the oral arguments in the Defense of Marriage Act case (United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 2:45 pm
Ice, which deals with Blakely's applicability to consecutive sentencing determinations, and United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:39 am
I've added a statement on the case from The Owners' Rights Initiative, about the Supreme Court ruling that even books purchased outside the United States are subject to the 'First Sale Doctrine' as long as they are legally purchased (piracy is still a no-no), and brought into the United States. [read post]
Summary The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal brought by a detained patient who alleged that his detention, following recall to a secure hospital unit, had been unlawful because an insufficient explanation of the reason for the recall had been provided to him within 72 hours of his re-admission. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:24 am by Mary Szarkowicz
International Court of Justice Issues Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 11:06 am
The United Supreme Court on Wednesday, in a 6-3 ruling, held that a drug company is not protected from state law claims simply because the federal government approved the product and its labeling. [read post]